<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" encoding="utf-8">
    <channel>
        <title>Pembina Institute's Oil Sands News</title>
        <description>Latest media releases, op-eds, publications and blog posts from Oil Sands Watch.</description>
        <link>http://www.oilsandswatch.org/</link>
        <language>en</language>
        <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 14:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
        <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 15:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <docs>http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/rss/rss.html</docs>
        <generator> </generator>
        <managingEditor>rssadmin@pembina.org</managingEditor>
        <webMaster>rssadmin@pembina.org</webMaster>
                <item>
            <title>Rethinking how to respond to oilsands criticism (op-ed)</title>
            <link>http://www.oilsandswatch.org/op-ed/2053</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.oilsandswatch.org/op-ed/2053</guid>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;
Ongoing criticism of oilsands development in Alberta is
wreaking reputational havoc on our province, culminating in an unfortunate hit
to tourism operators with the recent Rethink Alberta campaign. We think a
different response could level the criticisms.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We're not alone. U.S. Ambassador David Jacobson challenged
industry to &quot;do more to demonstrate how they're meeting the challenges of
providing energy security while meeting their obligations of environmental
stewardship.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That's not what's happening though. Instead, we're
witnessing a self-defeating cycle of ramped up public relations from the
Government of Alberta that never truly addresses the substance of the
criticisms directed at the province's regulation of the oilsands industry.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <author>Simon Dyer</author>
            <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Lack of tailings dam transparency highlights increased risk to downstream communities (media release)</title>
            <link>http://www.oilsandswatch.org/media-release/2052</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.oilsandswatch.org/media-release/2052</guid>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;Two weeks after a parliamentary committee quietly cancelled its report on water and oilsands pollution, a new report reveals that oilsands development continues to create risks for communities downstream.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <author>Jennifer Grant</author>
            <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>North Lifeblood (fact sheet) (publication)</title>
            <link>http://www.oilsandswatch.org/pub/2050</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.oilsandswatch.org/pub/2050</guid>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;This fact sheet, Northern Lifeblood — Empowering Northern
Leaders to Protect the Mackenzie River Basin from the Risks of Oil Sands
Development, provides an overview of threats to the Mackenzie River Basin and actions that leaders in
the North can take to protect their waters.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <author>Jennifer Grant, Simon Dyer, Nathan Lemphers, Jennifer Dagg</author>
            <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Northern Lifeblood (publication)</title>
            <link>http://www.oilsandswatch.org/pub/2051</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.oilsandswatch.org/pub/2051</guid>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;This report, Northern Lifeblood — Empowering Northern
Leaders to Protect the Mackenzie River Basin from the Risks of Oil Sands
Development, investigates current and future threats to the Mackenzie River Basin,
including the risks associated with the 170 square kilometres of toxic tailings
lakes in the Athabasca watershed. The report also details opportunities for both
northern leaders and the federal government to proactively protect northern
waters.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <author>Jennifer Grant, Simon Dyer, Nathan Lemphers, Jennifer Dagg</author>
            <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Are the oil sands prepared for a worst-case scenario? Research assignment turns into wild goose chase (blog)</title>
            <link>http://www.oilsandswatch.org/blog/76</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.oilsandswatch.org/blog/76</guid>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;I recently went looking to see what kinds of plans were in
place in case of an emergency involving 840 million cubic metres (equivalent to
330,000 Olympic-sized swimming pools) of toxic liquid tailings waste deposited by oil
sands mines north of Fort McMurray . The problem is, instead of finding what I
was looking for, I was sent on a wild goose chase, leading me to wonder: Does
anyone know what happens if something goes wrong?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <author>Nathan Lemphers</author>
            <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 23:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Blowout shines spotlight on in situ’s impacts (blog)</title>
            <link>http://www.oilsandswatch.org/blog/75</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.oilsandswatch.org/blog/75</guid>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;For 36
hours this past weekend, a stream of high-temperature water and oil
shot 12
metres into the air after a wellhead blew out at an in situ oil sands
site just
eight kilometres from the town of Conklin in northeastern Alberta. This
incident points to the fact that in situ, contrary to industry claims,
is not a benign or risk-free extraction method.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <author>Terra Simieritsch</author>
            <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 18:11:24 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>U.S. uncertain about oil sands: How should Canada respond? (blog)</title>
            <link>http://www.oilsandswatch.org/blog/74</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.oilsandswatch.org/blog/74</guid>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;A vigorous debate is occurring in the U.S. over the use of oil from
oil sands and particularly about a proposed pipeline, the Keystone, that would
transport that oil from Alberta to the U.S. Gulf coast. As the debate unfolds,
an appropriate question to be asking is: How should Canada respond?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <author>Danielle Droitsch</author>
            <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 06:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Review of Enbridge oilsands pipeline doesn't stack up (media release)</title>
            <link>http://www.oilsandswatch.org/media-release/2043</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.oilsandswatch.org/media-release/2043</guid>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;The proposed environmental assessment of the Enbridge Gateway
oilsands pipeline falls short, according to an analysis released today
by the Pembina Institute.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <author>Karen Campbell</author>
            <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>How Do Two Pipelines Stack Up? (publication)</title>
            <link>http://www.oilsandswatch.org/pub/2044</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.oilsandswatch.org/pub/2044</guid>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;A chart comparing the review processes for the Mackenzie Gas Project and the Enbridge Northern Gateway Pipeline&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <author>Karen Campbell</author>
            <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>We can't count on environmental assessment process for a fair decision on Enbridge Gateway oil sands pipeline (blog)</title>
            <link>http://www.oilsandswatch.org/blog/73</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.oilsandswatch.org/blog/73</guid>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;As the Enbridge Gateway oil sands pipeline proposal lurches toward
the environmental assessment process, B.C. Premier Gordon Campbell is on record
saying: &quot;Enbridge has a proposal which is going through a process . . . It will
include the most rigorous environmental regime there is anywhere in North
America.&quot; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While it sounds nice, the reality is
that the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.vancouversun.com/opinion/Ignatieff+promises+tanker/3185242/story.html&quot;&gt;increasingly
controversial&lt;/a&gt; pipeline will be reviewed by a Joint Review Panel established
by the National Energy Board and Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency. And
if the Mackenzie Gas Project is any indication, there are some very real
problems with how the federal government is making decisions about major energy
projects. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <author>Karen Campbell</author>
            <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 06:07:07 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>BP oil spill: Not an argument to ramp up oilsands production (op-ed)</title>
            <link>http://www.oilsandswatch.org/op-ed/2042</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.oilsandswatch.org/op-ed/2042</guid>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;It's been more than two months now that oil from BP's blown out
Deepwater Horizon rig has been gushing into the Gulf of Mexico. A
man-made disaster of epic proportions, some people are now claiming
that it makes Alberta's landlocked oilsands look safe in comparison. In
fact, that statement couldn't be further from the truth.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <author>Simon Dyer</author>
            <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Syncrude found guilty, but has justice been served? (blog)</title>
            <link>http://www.oilsandswatch.org/blog/72</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.oilsandswatch.org/blog/72</guid>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;More than two years after 1,600 ducks died in Syncrude's
Aurora tailings lake, the oil sands operator has been found guilty in a high-profile court case that almost never happened. Since then, the amount of tailings
(the toxic liquid waste produced by the oil sands extraction process) has
steadily increased in volume by 200 million litres, or 80 Olympic-sized
swimming pools, every day to now cover an area of 170 km&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;. It raises
the question: Did the ducks die in vain?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <author>Simon Dyer</author>
            <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 16:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Federal government out of step with leading thinkers on sustainability, climate and energy issues: survey (media release)</title>
            <link>http://www.oilsandswatch.org/media-release/2041</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.oilsandswatch.org/media-release/2041</guid>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;The federal government is out of step with leading thinkers on issues 
related to sustainability, energy and climate change, according to the 
results of a groundbreaking survey of more than 5,000 experts and 
government officials.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <author>Marlo Raynolds</author>
            <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>The 2010 Global Thought Leader Survey on Sustainability (publication)</title>
            <link>http://www.oilsandswatch.org/pub/2040</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.oilsandswatch.org/pub/2040</guid>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;The views of more than 5,000 sustainability thought leaders
in Canada, the U.S. and Europe are outlined in &lt;em&gt;The 2010 Global 
Thought Leader Survey on Sustainability.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <author>McAllister Opinion Research</author>
            <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>If the oil sands aren’t high carbon, why do oil sands proponents spend so much time fighting low carbon fuel standards? (blog)</title>
            <link>http://www.oilsandswatch.org/blog/71</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.oilsandswatch.org/blog/71</guid>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;At the same time as they are fighting low carbon fuel standards, oil sands proponents are also heavily engaged in a campaign to convince the public that their greenhouse gas emissions are essentially no different from other crude oils. They can’t have it both ways.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <author>Marc Huot</author>
            <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 19:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Pembina reacts to proposed future federal coal regulations (media release)</title>
            <link>http://www.oilsandswatch.org/media-release/2038</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.oilsandswatch.org/media-release/2038</guid>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;Marlo Raynolds, Executive Director of the Pembina Institute, says proposed future federal coal regulations are a &quot;comitment in principle&quot; that must be backed by a massive scale-up of government support for renewable energy, and a clear plan to reach Canada's 2020 climate target.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <author>Marlo Raynolds, Matthew Bramley</author>
            <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Dispatch from the Great Bear Rainforest: On the scene of a battle shaping up to be bigger than Clayoquot Sound (blog)</title>
            <link>http://www.oilsandswatch.org/blog/70</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.oilsandswatch.org/blog/70</guid>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;Kitamaat Village, B.C. — Sometimes it takes tar balls
washing up on beaches, as the people of the Gulf coast are experiencing due to
the BP oil spill, before we really &lt;em&gt;get&lt;/em&gt;
the environmental risk we've allowed to threaten our land, air and water. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But that's not the case here on B.C.'s North Coast, in the
heart of the Great Bear Rainforest and home to a growing opposition to the proposed Enbridge Northern Gateway oil sands pipeline.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <author>Emma Gilchrist</author>
            <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 05:15:18 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>In situ production not an environmental gamechanger (blog)</title>
            <link>http://www.oilsandswatch.org/blog/69</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.oilsandswatch.org/blog/69</guid>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;While oil sands mining is set to expand for decades, in situ
techniques are expected to surpass mining by 2017, changing the face of oil
sands production. Industry has argued in situ is a less impactful form of
production, but we've done our homework and the results don't support industry
claims. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <author>Simon Dyer</author>
            <pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 15:05:47 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Mining vs. In Situ (publication)</title>
            <link>http://www.oilsandswatch.org/pub/2017</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.oilsandswatch.org/pub/2017</guid>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Mining vs. In Situ&lt;/em&gt; provides an initial, much-needed comparison of the environmental impacts of oil sands mining and in situ extraction.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <author>Simon Dyer, Marc Huot</author>
            <pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Climate Action Network Canada Calls on Finance Minister to Take his Department’s Advice and Phase out Fossil Fuel Subsidies  (media release)</title>
            <link>http://www.oilsandswatch.org/media-release/2030</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.oilsandswatch.org/media-release/2030</guid>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;A leaked memo to Finance Minister Jim Flaherty
advised the minister to live up to a G20 commitment to phase out tax
breaks to the companies that produce coal, oil and gas. With just four
weeks left before the G20 summit in Toronto, it's time for Minister
Flaherty and Prime Minister Harper to commit to a Canadian plan to end
tax breaks to fossil fuel producers.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <author>Clare Demerse, Climate Action Network-Canada</author>
            <pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>


    </channel>
</rss>
